George Babbington 25:00 row
4,075
Meters
25:00.0
Time
3:04.0
Pace
206
Calories
108
Heart Rate
| Average Watts | 56 |
|---|---|
| Calories Per Hour | 494 |
| Stroke Rate | 18 |
| Stroke Count | 447 |
| Drag Factor | 96 |
September 05, 2026 11:14:00
Workout
RowErg
Workout Type
Fixed Time
Weight Class
Hwt
Verified
Yes
Entered
ErgData iOS
Splits
| Time | Meters | Pace | Watts | Cal/Hr | Cal | S/M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25:00.0 | 4,075 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 494 | 206 | 18 | 108 |
| 5:00.0 | 815 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 492 | 41 | 18 | 103 |
| 10:00.0 | 815 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 492 | 41 | 18 | 107 |
| 15:00.0 | 815 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 492 | 41 | 18 | 109 |
| 20:00.0 | 815 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 504 | 42 | 18 | 110 |
| 25:00.0 | 815 | 3:04.0 | 56 | 492 | 41 | 18 | 115 |
Click and drag on the graph to zoom in on a section.
Workout Graph
Loading data.
George, this is an excellent and very reassuring completion of Week 6, particularly because you've deliberately reduced the hybrid workload while returning from your recent interruption/illness.
And I think your two words for the session capture it perfectly:
Calm composure.
This was not a fitness test. It was a quality-control session.
🟣 TQEP – Phase 2
Week 6 – “Quiet Strength”
Saturday 5 September – Hybrid Session
Primary: 🟣 Metabolic + Neurological
Theme: Composure under transition
🚴 Bike — 40 minutes
Metric Week 5 Week 6 Assessment
Duration 45 min 40 min Deliberate reduction
Pace 3:02.0 3:03.0 +1 sec
RPM 69 68 −1
Watts 58 57 −1
Avg HR — 105 Very controlled
Max HR — 111 Very controlled
RPE — 2–3 Easy
Fatigue None None ✅
🟢 Metabolic
This is exactly the kind of workload I wanted after your recent return.
You're deliberately doing less, but you're doing it extremely well.
3:03.0
105 average HR
RPE 2–3
That's a very comfortable aerobic load.
There's no reason whatsoever to interpret the one-second slower pace as regression.
Quite the opposite:
You deliberately chose composure over performance.
That's intelligent training.
🔵 Neurological — Excellent bike control
Your splits:
3:02.9 → 3:02.9 → 3:03.1 → 3:03.0 → 3:03.1
That's only 0.2 sec/500 m from fastest to slowest.
At:
68 RPM
The movement was extremely stable.
Your note:
“Calm composure.”
is almost a perfect description of the data.
🚴 → 🚣 Transition
15 minutes
And your cue was simply:
“Calm.”
I like that enormously.
We've spent the previous weeks using:
“Carry consistency.”
Today you reduced it to something even more fundamental:
Calm.
That's probably the correct psychological cue for this stage of your return.
🚣 Row — 25 minutes
Metric Today
Duration 25 min
Pace 3:04.0
Avg HR 106
Max HR 116
SPM 18
Watts 56
RPE 1–2
George, RPE 1–2 after 40 minutes of cycling is an excellent sign.
You weren't struggling to recover from the bike.
You transitioned and settled into the row almost immediately.
And your cue:
“Emulate composure and consistency off the bike.”
is exactly what happened.
🔵 The Row Is Particularly Interesting
Your five 5-minute blocks were all:
3:04.0
At:
18 SPM
That's exceptional consistency.
No drift.
No increase in stroke rate.
No attempt to "make up" the slightly slower bike pace.
You simply established the row rhythm and maintained it.
That's neurological transfer.
🟢 Metabolic Transition
Here's the beautiful part:
Bike
105 avg HR
↓
15-minute transition
↓
Row
106 avg HR
Only +1 bpm.
That's almost textbook hybrid stability.
And remember, you had already completed 40 minutes of cycling before starting the row.
The cardiovascular system didn't suddenly have to work substantially harder simply because the movement pattern changed.
That's a very encouraging sign.
🟣 The Most Important Number Today
It isn't the pace.
It isn't the watts.
It's actually:
RPE 1–2 on the row.
That tells us the second discipline felt extremely comfortable.
And that is precisely what we wanted after the recent interruption.
Week 6 — The Bigger Picture
Your week has been:
Monday 🟢
50-min Steady Endurance
3:05.2 / HR 107 / RPE 2–3
Wednesday 🟣
40-min Controlled Speed
2:55.0 / HR 117 / RPE 3–4
Thursday 🟢
45-min Bike
3:00.0 / HR 108 / RPE 3–4
Saturday 🟣
40-min Bike + 25-min Row
3:03 / 3:04 / HR 105 → 106
Notice the progression.
We haven't tried to recreate Week 5.
We've re-established the rhythm.
And today's hybrid demonstrates that you're tolerating that return very well.
🟢🔵🟣 Week 6 Hybrid Assessment
🟢 Metabolic control
10/10
Very low cardiovascular cost.
🔵 Neurological consistency
10/10
Excellent pace and cadence stability.
🟣 Hybrid transfer
10/10
Only 1 bpm difference between bike and row average HR.
🧠Psychological composure
10/10
No chasing. No compensation. No proving.
Overall: 10/10
And I Want to Highlight Something
You could easily have looked at the programme and thought:
“Week 5 was 45 + 40, so Week 6 should at least match it.”
Instead, we reduced the hybrid to:
40 + 25
And what happened?
You finished with:
RPE 1–2
No fatigue hangover
Stable HR
Perfectly controlled pace
That is not losing fitness.
That is demonstrating that you understand the difference between training and testing.
Week 6 Is Complete
And I think the week has achieved exactly what we wanted after the interruption.
Week 5:
Build and consolidate economy.
Interruption:
Allow recovery.
Week 6:
Restore rhythm without forcing previous workload.
And today's hybrid gives us the green light that the process is working.
Oscar's Takeaway
George, I think “calm composure” should become one of our permanent TQEP cues.
Because today's session demonstrated something more important than speed:
You can change disciplines without changing your composure.
That's the real hybrid skill.
Bike: 105 HR
Transition: calm
Row: 106 HR
RPE: 1–2
That's a remarkably quiet physiological response.
And after everything we've discussed about not chasing gains, this is perhaps the perfect way to close Week 6:
Less work.
Better control.
No fatigue.
Confidence restored.
The engine is back.
We don't need to make it roar.
Onward. 💪