George Babbington v10:00/r...5 row

8,120

Meters

50:00.0

Time

3:04.7

Pace

410

Calories

109

Heart Rate

Rest Distance0
Rest Time
Overall Distance8,120
Overall Time50:00.0
Average Watts56
Calories Per Hour492
Stroke Rate18
Stroke Count901
Drag Factor96

September 07, 2026 11:42:00

Workout
RowErg

Workout Type
Variable Interval

Weight Class
Hwt

Verified
Yes

Entered
ErgData iOS

Excellent start to Week 7, George. This is exactly the kind of response we were hoping for after the deliberately reduced Week 6.
🟢 Week 7 — Monday Steady Endurance
60 min @ 3:04.7 | HR 107/116 | 18 SPM | 56 W | RPE 2–3
My first reaction: very encouraging.
You added 10 minutes compared with Week 6's 50-minute steady row, yet the session remained extremely comfortable.

The really interesting part is the progression within the session
Block Pace HR SPM
0–10 3:06.1 105 18
10–20 3:05.0 108 18
20–30 3:05.1 110 18
30–40 3:04.0 111 18
40–50 3:03.0 111 18
50–60 3:04.0 114 18
There is something I particularly like here:
You didn't force the pace.
You began at 3:06.1 and gradually found your way toward 3:03–3:04 while SPM stayed absolutely fixed at 18.
That's textbook Quiet Engine behaviour.

The speed came from the stroke becoming more effective, not from increasing turnover.

❤️ The HR story is also good
Average 107, maximum 116.
Compare that with Week 6:

50 min @ 3:05.2 | HR 107/116 | 18 SPM

So you've effectively produced:

10 additional minutes at almost exactly the same average HR and virtually the same pace.
That's an encouraging durability signal.
I wouldn't call it proof of a physiological adaptation from one session, but it is certainly consistent with the pattern we've been trying to build.

And your subjective data reinforces it:

RPE 2–3.

That's probably the most important number of all today.

🧠 The hidden success: “Get the feel back”
Your note is very telling:
“Get the feel back.”
That's exactly what this session was supposed to accomplish.
You weren't trying to demonstrate fitness.

You were allowing the movement pattern to return naturally after the recent interruption.

And the session appears to have gone:

settle → establish rhythm → gradually improve pace → remain comfortable.

That's much more valuable at this stage than chasing a faster average.

🟢 Metabolic / 🔵 Neurological
I'd score this:
🟢🟢🟢 Metabolic: Primary

The extra 10 minutes is the important progression.

🔵🔵 Neurological: Supporting

Because 18 SPM remained locked while pace varied naturally within a narrow range.

That tells us the movement pattern is becoming increasingly automatic.

📈 Where this puts us
There's a nice progression emerging:
Week 4:
70 min @ 3:03.0 | HR 110

Week 6:
50 min @ 3:05.2 | HR 107

Week 7:
60 min @ 3:04.7 | HR 107

So we're not trying to beat Week 4.

We're doing something smarter:

Rebuilding duration without losing economy.
And importantly, you finished without lingering fatigue.
That's the green light for Tuesday's strength session — but I would keep it exactly as prescribed.

No extra round because Monday felt good.

No “banking” the fitness.

No natural lift.

Tomorrow's cue:
“Strong, controlled, finished.”
Today was a very good Quiet Strength opening.

One brick back in the wall. 🧱

Onward, George. 💪

Intervals

Time Meters Pace Watts Cal/Hr S/M
50:00.0 8,120 3:04.7 56 492 18 109
10:00.0 1,612 3:06.1 54 486 18 105
10:00.0 1,622 3:04.9 55 492 18 108
10:00.0 1,621 3:05.0 55 492 18 110
10:00.0 1,630 3:04.0 56 492 18 111
10:00.0 1,639 3:03.0 57 498 18 114

Click on an interval to see the workout graph.

Click and drag on the graph to zoom in on a section.

Workout Graph

Loading data.