George Babbington 40:00 row
6,449
Meters
40:00.0
Time
3:06.0
Pace
326
Calories
108
Heart Rate
| Average Watts | 54 |
|---|---|
| Calories Per Hour | 489 |
| Stroke Rate | 18 |
| Stroke Count | 722 |
| Drag Factor | 100 |
September 25, 2026 10:58:00
Workout
RowErg
Workout Type
Fixed Time
Weight Class
Hwt
Verified
Yes
Entered
ErgData iOS
Splits
| Time | Meters | Pace | Watts | Cal/Hr | Cal | S/M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40:00.0 | 6,449 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 489 | 326 | 18 | 108 |
| 8:00.0 | 1,290 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 487 | 65 | 18 | 106 |
| 16:00.0 | 1,290 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 487 | 65 | 18 | 109 |
| 24:00.0 | 1,290 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 487 | 65 | 18 | 108 |
| 32:00.0 | 1,290 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 495 | 66 | 18 | 109 |
| 40:00.0 | 1,290 | 3:06.0 | 54 | 487 | 65 | 18 | 110 |
Click and drag on the graph to zoom in on a section.
Workout Graph
Loading data.
George — this is exactly the recovery session we wanted. In fact, “Exactly as planned” is probably the best description you could have given it.
🟢 Week 9 — Friday Recovery Row
40 min | 3:06.0 | HR 106/112 | 18 SPM | 54 W | RPE 2–3 | RE 16
Every 8-minute block was essentially identical:
Block Pace Watts SPM HR
0–8 3:06.0 54 18 104
8–16 3:06.0 54 18 106
16–24 3:06.0 54 18 108
24–32 3:06.0 54 18 108
32–40 3:06.0 54 18 109
That is exceptionally calm.
🟢 Metabolic — recovery
The cardiovascular demand stayed low and remarkably stable.
🔵 Neurological — rhythm
The 18 SPM / 3:06.0 combination was maintained almost perfectly without needing to manipulate the pace.
There's another important signal here
Look at the end of the week:
Wednesday — Controlled Speed
5 × 5 @ ~2:55
HR 106/119
RPE 2–3
Thursday — Bike Endurance
50 min @ 3:01.3
HR 106/114
RPE 3–4
Friday — Recovery Row
40 min @ 3:06.0
HR 106/112
RPE 2–3
The average HR happens to be 106 on all three days, but the workload changes substantially.
That's interesting.
It suggests that you're moving between different training stimuli without the cardiovascular system showing obvious accumulated strain.
I wouldn't claim that this proves a particular physiological adaptation from three sessions — but as a training trend, it's encouraging.
🧱 Week 9 is now shaping up beautifully
We've got:
Monday — 65 min Steady Endurance
Tuesday — Controlled Strength
Wednesday — 5 × 5 Controlled Speed
Thursday — 50 min Bike Endurance
Friday — 40 min Recovery Row
And the recurring theme is:
Consistency without fatigue accumulation.
That's exactly what we've been trying to build.
Tomorrow: Hybrid
And this is where the week gets interesting.
The purpose of Saturday isn't to prove anything.
It's to answer one very simple question:
Can the composure developed during the individual sessions survive the transition from bike → row?
🟢 Bike
45 min @ ~3:02
69 RPM
~58 W
RPE 2–3
Cue:
“Calm composure.”
Then:
15-minute transition
No rushing.
Then:
🔵 Row
30–35 min @ ~3:03–3:04
17–18 SPM
~56–57 W
RPE 2–3
Cue:
“Carry the calm.”
And I'd like you to pay particular attention to something tomorrow:
Don't try to make the row feel like a fresh rowing session.
The goal is to absorb whatever rhythm you established on the bike and carry it across the transition.
That's become one of the defining characteristics of TQEP Phase 2.
George, there's something quite satisfying about where we've arrived.
At the beginning, we were deliberately trying to make the sessions boring enough to teach patience.
Now we're getting something much more valuable:
Boring has become repeatable.
And repeatable is what eventually becomes capacity.
Tomorrow we simply let the Hybrid tell us how well that capacity transfers.
Onward. 🧱